There is also the "Signal On Halt" rexx stmt. Haven tested how much it helps in this case though.
Regards, Thomas Berg _______________________________________________________ Thomas Berg Specialist AM/SM&S SWEDBANK AB (publ) > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > För Itschak Mugzach > Skickat: den 26 oktober 2012 14:22 > Till: [email protected] > Ämne: Re: Disabling interrupt and trace for Rexx execs > > I don't care that the user will look at the program logic. He is not > authorized to execute some of the commands in the program. The thing is > that I do not want the user to get control when the program run as they > can see run-time results of the program or even exit from the program. > I tried Russ suggestion using EXECUTIL HT and it worked for me. TX. > > ITschak > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Gerhard Postpischil > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On 10/25/2012 10:28 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > > > >> Hasn't that been dead for decades? Certainly the current version of > >> ENQ only accpets SMC=NONE and SMC=STEP. > >> > > > > FSVO decades. It's in OS/390; I haven't had a chance to try it under > z/OS. > > And there is always the possibility that they kept the function, but > > removed ways to get it, a la LABEL SVC. > > > > Gerhard Postpischil > > Bradford, VT > > > > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**----- > - > > ---- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM- > MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
