Sounds like something got missed during the SR unit testing 

Scott ford
www.identityforge.com

Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll 
understand. - Chinese Proverb


On Nov 12, 2012, at 11:36 AM, "Barkow, Eileen" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I  had a problem including html code in the SR text since it interfered with 
> the html used to process the SR itself.
> The gist was that everything after the inserted html data was not visible.
> They said that this will be fixed in a future release of SR. 
> That sounded kind of ridiculous - there are numerous cases where text 
> being copied into the SR description and documentation  would contain html 
> code (like trace and dump data and data extracted from a web page).
> Did they not ever test a case where html code would be inserted into the SR?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Staller, Allan
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 10:22 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Updates to the IBM Service Request application coming Nov 14, 
> 2012
> 
> Be Afraid! Be Very Afraid!
> 
> <snip>
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/IBMElectronicSupport/entry/sr25e?lang=en
> 
> Updates to the IBM Service Request application coming Nov 14, 2012 Key new 
> functions for IBM Service Request (SR) release 2.5
> 
> </snip>
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to