In <p06240801ccf644601639@[192.168.1.11]>, on 12/18/2012
at 11:09 AM, "Robert A. Rosenberg" <[email protected]> said:
>There is also the issue that BAS/BASR does not always produce the
>same result as BAL/BALR based on some factors such as AMODE. I
>know that in AMODE 24 BAL/BALR will supply information in the high
>byte of the return register that is no supplied by BAS/BASR. In
>AMODE31 I think the results are the same (I do not have a PoPs at
>hand to check).
A quick look at PoOps confirms that BAL[R] and BAS[R] are equivalent
in 31 and 64 bit mode, differing only in 24 bit mode.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
