Certainly when I get data from customers they might've used either TRSMAIN or AMATERSE and it still unpacks fine with either. This is something I do on a regular and frequent basis.
Cheers, Martin Martin Packer, zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM +44-7802-245-584 email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker Blog: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker From: Roger Bolan <rogerbo...@gmail.com> To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu, Date: 12/20/2012 01:12 AM Subject: Re: Why would TRSMAIN end with RC=0 but not unpack the data? Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> I think on almost all systems nowadays TRSMAIN is just an alias for AMATERSE. On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:42 PM, R.S. <r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl>wrote: > W dniu 2012-12-18 18:51, Binyamin Dissen pisze: > > >> Wild guess: Customer used AMATERSE and yo are using TRSMAIN. > AFAIK AMATERSE support more data formats than TRSMAIN. Can it be the issue? > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
