On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:38:37 -0800, retired mainframer <[email protected]> wrote:
>My rule of thumb, drilled into me long before z/OS, was "any change to the >link list merits a refresh of LLA." Don't know if it's still valid but it >never caused a problem. To me, it looks like very cheap insurance. > That would be true of changing something in an existing library in the LNKLST, but not to dynamic add of a library. The second statement about cheap insurance isl true, although I would change it to LLA UPDATE. A refresh of the entire LNKLST could break something (plus has a negative performance impact). Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:[email protected] Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
