WTF? Where do you see "OS compatibility"? The issues that I raised were all architecture and instruction set.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of Charles Mills [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 12:39 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: z/OS use of "legacy" programming languages If you are going to include OS compatibility as well as hardware compatibility then there are issues such as control blocks that have been moved above line. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 9:07 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: z/OS use of "legacy" programming languages > The only thing which might not work would > be something which was CPU speed dependent. That's not the only thing. A program that relies on getting certain program interrupts might fail. Then there's the ASCII bit, although I would be very surprised if anybody actually used it. There are optional instructions that IBM carried over. There's probably more that I haven't thought of. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
