We mirror with XRC, which I believe is Global Mirror. (I cannot keep the 
current lingo straight.) In my shop, we have a business need to put any 
device--DASD or tape--online to any LPAR regardless of location. In order to do 
that, device addresses *must* be unique. If you have absolutely no need to do 
that, then I don't think uniqueness is required. OTOH is costs little to make 
them unique. If you don't do it from the get-go, it will be very difficult in 
the future. 

.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Michael Babcock
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 7:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: (External):Re: Two Processors and One IODF

CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL

Thanks!

We are using Global Mirror for replication.  Not sure if using the same device 
addresses will be a problem or not for GM.

So, does everyone recommend different device addresses?

On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 1:01 PM Jackson, Rob <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I don't know if anyone has pointed it out, but if this is a brand new, 
> vanilla CEC, before you even have to worry about an IODF, you need an 
> IOCDS.  Generally you create that deck from an IODF, and I can't 
> imagine you would choose not to.  All of our CECs are defined in one 
> IODF.  For a new machine across the state, we sent the IOCDS deck for 
> the target CEC (and common ICC configs) to the CE, and he put them on 
> a thumb drive; we then ran stand-alone IOCP to load the HSA.  Then 
> with any (I would hope) form of replication you use, the IODF needed 
> for all the recovery LPARs is "just already there" on your recovery 
> SYS1.IPLPARM/IODF volume.
>
> Our DASD CUs and device addresses are different (I'm thinking they had 
> to be for either flavor of replication), but we don't have that many, 
> so we don't have to worry about running out.  Our LPAR numbers are the 
> same on all CECs, and our OS configs are defined only once and are 
> used on all respective LPARs.
>
> There's nothing to it, and I don't know of a single reason not to have 
> one common IODF.
>
> First Horizon Bank
> Mainframe Technical Support

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to