Ours is simply a DR site so currently we don’t have that requirement.

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jesse 1 Robinson <jesse1.robin...@sce.com>
wrote:

> We mirror with XRC, which I believe is Global Mirror. (I cannot keep the
> current lingo straight.) In my shop, we have a business need to put any
> device--DASD or tape--online to any LPAR regardless of location. In order
> to do that, device addresses *must* be unique. If you have absolutely no
> need to do that, then I don't think uniqueness is required. OTOH is costs
> little to make them unique. If you don't do it from the get-go, it will be
> very difficult in the future.
>
> .
> .
> J.O.Skip Robinson
> Southern California Edison Company
> Electric Dragon Team Paddler
> SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
> 323-715-0595 Mobile
> 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
> robin...@sce.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf
> Of Michael Babcock
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 7:10 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):Re: Two Processors and One IODF
>
> CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL
>
> Thanks!
>
> We are using Global Mirror for replication.  Not sure if using the same
> device addresses will be a problem or not for GM.
>
> So, does everyone recommend different device addresses?
>
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 1:01 PM Jackson, Rob <rwjack...@firsthorizon.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't know if anyone has pointed it out, but if this is a brand new,
> > vanilla CEC, before you even have to worry about an IODF, you need an
> > IOCDS.  Generally you create that deck from an IODF, and I can't
> > imagine you would choose not to.  All of our CECs are defined in one
> > IODF.  For a new machine across the state, we sent the IOCDS deck for
> > the target CEC (and common ICC configs) to the CE, and he put them on
> > a thumb drive; we then ran stand-alone IOCP to load the HSA.  Then
> > with any (I would hope) form of replication you use, the IODF needed
> > for all the recovery LPARs is "just already there" on your recovery
> SYS1.IPLPARM/IODF volume.
> >
> > Our DASD CUs and device addresses are different (I'm thinking they had
> > to be for either flavor of replication), but we don't have that many,
> > so we don't have to worry about running out.  Our LPAR numbers are the
> > same on all CECs, and our OS configs are defined only once and are
> > used on all respective LPARs.
> >
> > There's nothing to it, and I don't know of a single reason not to have
> > one common IODF.
> >
> > First Horizon Bank
> > Mainframe Technical Support
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
-- 
Michael Babcock
OneMain Financial
z/OS Systems Programmer, Lead

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to