I’m running the program under test After I do decocatenate verb 04 With the ddname text 01 I get a rc 0 from SVC 99 I then go to ISPF Do a ISRDDN
And I have a number of files actually 100 Each with a ddname SYS00007,SYS00008 etc. This indicates to me that although they are decocatenated they are still allocated Thanks > On Oct 1, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:58:56 -0400 Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > :>I allocate a number of datasets the last text unit being DALCLOSE > :>(unallocated on close) In my second step I concatenate the datasets. At > :>EOF I close them after wards I deconcatenate them My question is > :>shouldn't the individual datasets be unallocated as well > > What happens when you, thru JCL, concat several datasets with FREE=CLOSE? > > -- > Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> > http://www.dissensoftware.com > > Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel > > > Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, > you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. > > I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, > especially those from irresponsible companies. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
