Would this be on cbttape.org

If not would you mind sharing 

Thanks 



> On Oct 1, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Long ago (actually 1989 I think) I wrote a CONCAT TSO command which can be 
> used to add or remove data sets from a concatenated list. It can also perform 
> a FREE. This loops round each entry in the concatenated set and frees each 
> data set.
> 
> It still works a treat.
> 
> I still have the code should anyone want it.
> 
> Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
> Consultant working on contract for BMC mainframe Services by RSM Partners
> ‘Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt like everyone is.’
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
> Joseph Reichman
> Sent: 01 October 2020 18:25
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset
> 
> I’m running the program under test
> After I do decocatenate verb 04
> With the ddname text 01
> I get a rc 0 from SVC 99
> I then go to ISPF
> Do a ISRDDN 
> 
> And I have a number of files actually 100 Each with a ddname 
> SYS00007,SYS00008  etc. This indicates to me that although they are 
> decocatenated they are still allocated 
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Oct 1, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:58:56 -0400 Joseph Reichman 
>> <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> :>I allocate a number of datasets the last text unit being DALCLOSE 
>> :>(unallocated on close)  In my  second step I concatenate the datasets. At
>> :>EOF I  close them after wards I    deconcatenate them My question is
>> :>shouldn't the individual datasets be unallocated as well
>> 
>> What happens when you, thru JCL, concat several datasets with FREE=CLOSE?
>> 
>> --
>> Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> 
>> http://www.dissensoftware.com
>> 
>> Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
>> 
>> 
>> Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, 
>> you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
>> 
>> I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, 
>> especially those from irresponsible companies.
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to