Hi Joseph,
Ref :
1) I can not allocate this many datasets to
A job step that’s includes using SVC 99
This is not true.
When using SVC99 you can use S99TIOEX flag to use extended TIOT. I will need to
run authorized for this.
If you are not running authorized you can use flag S99ACUCB instead. It will
cause the creation of an extended TIOT even if S99TIOEX is not coded and it
does not require authorization.
Ciao,
--------------------------------------------------
Raphael Dal Pos / z/OS Support
Generali Shared Services S.c.a.r.l.
GSS\CIN-MF (Central Infrastructure Mainframe)
11-17, Avenue François Mitterrand
93200 Saint Denis / France
Wilo W 03 B1 029C
[email protected] +(33)1-58-38-59-67
or mobile +(33)6.24.33.20.87
--------------------------------------------------
"MVS: Guilty, until proven innocent !!" RDP 2009
-----Message d'origine-----
De : IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] De la part
de Joseph Reichman
Envoyé : mercredi 7 octobre 2020 19:28
À : [email protected]
Objet : Re: dataset allocation
There are two main issues here
1) I can not allocate this many datasets to
A job step that’s includes using SVC 99
2) The job step times out because I have reached a 5 minute CPU time limit on
the job step
Sri from my understanding said DFSORT can overcome these two problems
I’m looking at the DFSORT manual
Thank You
> On Oct 7, 2020, at 1:16 PM, Jeremy Nicoll <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, at 18:06, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>> I work for the IRS I have to search thru year 2020 data that’s 4,467
>> files about 240,000 records per file and a record length could be
>> 10,000 bytes
>> VB files
>
> And you've said that multiple times. No-one cares who you work
> for, but we do care about the technical issues you're facing.
>
>
> Every single time you ask for help, no matter on what topic, it's nearly
> impossible for anyone to find out what exactly you're trying to do.
>
> Why don't you just answer the questions?
>
> Are the records in the file in any particular order?
>
> Are you looking for particular values in fixed locations in the records?
>
> Are you looking for records where there's definable relationships between
> values in specific records?
>
> Is there any way that - say - you can do a first scan to make subsets of
> records before you then examine those in much more detail?
>
> --
> Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
