Thank you I did not know that 

> On Oct 7, 2020, at 2:13 PM, DAL POS Raphael <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Joseph, 
> 
> Ref : 
> 1) I can not allocate this many datasets to 
>    A job step that’s includes using SVC 99
> 
> This is not true. 
> 
> When using SVC99 you can use S99TIOEX flag to use extended TIOT. I will need 
> to run authorized for this. 
> 
> If you are not running authorized you can use flag S99ACUCB instead. It will 
> cause the creation of an extended TIOT even if S99TIOEX is not coded and it 
> does not require authorization. 
> 
> Ciao,  
> 
> -------------------------------------------------- 
> Raphael Dal Pos / z/OS Support
> Generali Shared Services S.c.a.r.l.
> GSS\CIN-MF (Central Infrastructure Mainframe)
> 11-17, Avenue François Mitterrand
> 93200 Saint Denis / France
> Wilo W 03 B1 029C  
> [email protected] +(33)1-58-38-59-67 
>                   or mobile +(33)6.24.33.20.87 
> -------------------------------------------------- 
> "MVS: Guilty, until proven innocent !!" RDP 2009 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] De la 
> part de Joseph Reichman
> Envoyé : mercredi 7 octobre 2020 19:28
> À : [email protected]
> Objet : Re: dataset allocation
> 
> There are two main issues here 
> 
> 1) I can not allocate this many datasets to 
>    A job step that’s includes using SVC 99
> 
> 2) The job step times out because I have reached a 5 minute CPU time limit on 
> the job step 
> 
> Sri from my understanding said DFSORT can overcome these two problems 
> 
> I’m looking at the DFSORT manual 
> 
> Thank You
> 
>>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 1:16 PM, Jeremy Nicoll <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, at 18:06, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>>> I work for the IRS I have to search thru year 2020 data that’s 4,467 
>>> files about 240,000 records per file and a record length could be 
>>> 10,000 bytes 
>>> VB files 
>> 
>> And you've said that multiple times.  No-one cares who you work
>> for, but we do care about the technical issues you're facing.
>> 
>> 
>> Every single time you ask for help, no matter on what topic, it's nearly 
>> impossible for anyone to find out what exactly you're trying to do.
>> 
>> Why don't you just answer the questions?
>> 
>> Are the records in the file in any particular order?
>> 
>> Are you looking for particular values in fixed locations in the records?
>> 
>> Are you looking for records where there's definable relationships between
>> values in specific records?
>> 
>> Is there any way that - say - you can do a first scan to make subsets of 
>> records before you then examine those in much more detail?
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own.
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to