Oh please I have enough problems 


> On Oct 8, 2020, at 10:34 PM, Clark Morris <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> [Default] On 8 Oct 2020 17:42:10 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
> [email protected] (Joseph Reichman) wrote:
> 
>> I have no idea who the sysorog is 
>> 
>> Honestly I’m told to do something I try my best to accomplish my superiors 
>> just tell me to ask different people 
>> 
>> I have come to the point no one wants to help so I take the attitude I’ll do 
>> what ever tell me what ever happens happens s 
>> 
> This task should be simple and require no authorized code. COBOL, PL1,
> and C/C== have the capability of writing JCL by reading the catalog
> (at worst an IDCAMS listing) emitting the appropriate JOB and EXEC
> images and using the data set names to create the input DD cards.  The
> actual selection and extraction program should be written in the
> higher level (COBOL, PL1, C/C++) language for which record
> descriptions for the data on the files exist (I would hope in 2020
> that it isn't assembler only).  Having written programs to deal with
> the SMF30 records with variable position keys and extract CALL and
> COPY information from COBOL and DYL280 (now Vision Results) programs,
> I find it hard to believe that you are faced with a difficult task. If
> the language is COBOL, I have written code in COBOL to handle bit
> switches (snitched from a posting on comp.software.year-2000) and
> reference modification is simple.
> 
> Clark Morris
> 
> 
> Clark Morris   
>> 
>>>> On Oct 8, 2020, at 8:36 PM, Jeremy Nicoll <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> ?On Thu, 8 Oct 2020, at 22:17, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>>>> There are number if restrictions in size of concatenation
>>> 
>>> Yes, but suppose you can concatenate n datasets per dd?
>>> 
>>> You read the list of datasetnames and then, n at a time, 
>>> generate the right JCL.
>>> 
>>> The point is, whatever the restrictions are, it cannot be hard 
>>> to do it.  
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> in addition there is CPU time step limit
>>> 
>>> I don't understand that. 
>>> 
>>> If you have a legitimate business need to process all this data your 
>>> systems programmers should provide you with a suitable job class.
>>> 
>>> Indeed didn't someone else who IS an IRS sysprog reply a bit earlier
>>> saying that such classes DO exist?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> I not working for a software co where I can go APF authorized and do 
>>>> what ever I want 
>>> 
>>> Things may have changed but I don't recall APF authorisation having 
>>> anything to do with time limits.
>>> 
>>> Speak to your sysprogs.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own.
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to