Supportability had definitely crossed my mind, so the clarification is both timely and appreciated.
Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 8:22 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ? Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization. It probably doesn't apply to this case, but if the documentation for a service says "invoke it this way" (and I don't just mean a "recommendation" or a "suggestion") and you choose to try something else that you think is equivalent, you are in unsupported territory. Do what you will; the risk is yours (and your site's). There can be system integrity concerns with invoking something authorized in a way that it does not intend, when done by an authorized invoker. That could apply to an AC=1 program that you choose to invoke by (for example) LINK from an APF-authorized program. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
