On 3/2/2013 5:50 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
Fair enough. But I think of "my" code as including those documented and common IBM macros. If I have to choose between not using SETRP and giving the assembler enough info to help diagnose some of my finger checks, well of course I have to use SETRP.
Over the years, there have been several IBM macros (off the top of my head: PGSER, TPUT, IEARBUP and others) whose code expansions were so bothersome that I was forced to hard-code my own. Some of the problems were mitigated in later releases; some still persist to this day.
-- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA 90245 http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
