Saying that COBOL is not part of the OS is not the same as saying it is not 
heavily used.  Regardless of its ugliness or beauty, any given compoenent is 
either part of the OS or not.  And I also believe that COBOL is not. . 


Bill Fairchild 
Franklin, TN 

“Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder 
acceptable, and to give the appearance of solidity to pure wind.” [George 
Orwell] 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted MacNEIL" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, March 3, 2013 9:41:00 AM 
Subject: Re: REFRPROT History Question 

>To  wit, nowadays, the absence in z/OS 
of complete support for 64-bit virtual.  (The less said of COBOL the better; 
it's not part of the OS.) 

Nice blinders-on statement! 
COBOL may be one of the ugliest languages around, but it's also (still, I 
believe) the most heavily used! 

Why not cater to your largest user base? 

- 
Ted MacNEIL 
[email protected] 
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to