[Default] On 6 Jan 2021 11:34:45 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
[email protected] (R.S.) wrote:

>W dniu 06.01.2021 o 09:19, Tom Ross pisze:
>> snip
>
>Tom,
>Thank you for the table.
>Actually I found some table in COBOL Migration Guide manual
>https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/hu/SS6SG3_6.3.0/migrate/igympreab2.html
> 
>
>but your table is more detailed - I mean dates.
>To make things more complex your table lack of third dimension ;-) I 
>mean MLC vs VUE flavours, which is technically irrelevant, but introduce 
>new PIDs (program numbers).
>And this is good you preserved version numbering - that simplifies 
>identification.
>
>Funny fact: I vaguely remember 1999 and some official announcements 
>about OS/VS COBOL withdrawals which were obscure and incomprehensible 
>for me at the time. ;-)
>
>BTW: This is pure curiosity, however was there any COBOL life on earth 
>before 1974? I'm sure it was some COBOL, but it was really looong time 
>ago. Maybe different product packaging and numbering, etc.

I used COBOL (19)61 and COBOL (19)63 on an RCA 301 in the 1963 - 1965
timeframe, then started with COBOL D on a 32K 360/30 with DOS
progressing to COBOL F on either the 64K mod 30 or 128K mod 40.  I
think I have used most versions on OS360 through MVS/XA in the time
frame 1977 - 1991 plus VS COBOL II release 1.4 (a major improvement)
followed by either COBOL 370 or COBOL for MVS and VM.

Clark Morris 
>
>Regards

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to