How about a parameter to specify the code page conversions?
Or can the output be an XMIT file so an XMIT viewer be used?

On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 9:02 AM Mario Bezzi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Andrew thank you.
>
> I agree on your point about keeping decompression and text conversion
> separate.
>
> The kind of full text conversion which unterse may perform only applies
> to text only files. Also for this limited use case, properly managing
> mainframe code pages is impossible as the terse container doesn't carry
> such information, and one can only guess.
>
> Making WWUNTERSE available we just wanted to share with the community
> something we found useful in our day by day activity.
>
> I hope this helps,
> mario
>
> On 3/13/21 11:33 PM, Andrew Rowley wrote:
> > On 14/03/2021 2:32 am, Robert Prins wrote:
> >>
> >> Unlike PCTERSE the program and IBMs offering it doesn't do any
> >> EBCDIC-ASCII translation...
> >>
> >> Why hasn't it been released as open source under the same license,
> >> after all it's just decompression code, and given the note in the
> >> User's Guide,
> >>
> >> "The decompress function of TERSE was recently ported to Java by IBM
> >> and it is available under the Apache 2.0 license and is available
> >> here. However, that program doesn’t support VBS format either."
> >>
> >> so that those with the knowledge can add features like EBCDIC-ASCII
> >> translation, or incorporate the code into something with a GUI?
> >>
> >
> > After a discussion with Mario at SHARE last year and some assistance
> > since I have been working on updating the open source Java code to
> > support variable length binary records.
> >
> > I have it working, I have just been very slow to update the
> > documentation and contribute it back to the original repository.
> >
> > You can see my changes here:
> > https://github.com/andrew890/tersedecompress
> >
> > What I would like to do is make it available as a class that can be used
> > from other applications, not just a command line application. Some of
> > the changes and refactoring have been done with that goal in mind.
> >
> > A secondary goal is a port to C# so it could run under .NET (Windows and
> > other platforms).
> >
> > But *why* do you want it to translate EBCDIC->ASCII? The current
> > implementation does that, but I haven't figured out why. It makes
> > testing much more complicated. It seems like it would be much better to
> > do the translation outside of an UNTERSE implementation, and have the
> > compression code give you back exactly the same data that was compressed.
> >
> > Andrew Rowley
> > Black Hill Software
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to