On Mar 10, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 23:30:23 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:

That would not really work to well. An additional parameter on the DD
statement would not allow for dynamic allocation and it would
endlessly make dynamic allocate a PITA especially when you have to re-
invent the input scanning for each utility.

Think reusable code.  Such reinvention has been necessary with the
advent of each new allocation parameter; PATH comes most readily
to mind. If there were a common subroutine to accept a string as
specification and generate TUs for SVC 99, recurrent reinvention
would be unnecessary.  BPXWDYN comes close; it even issues the
SVC 99.

That is part of the issue... for example IDCAMS and say IEHPROGM are opposites in age. IBM would reasonably refuse to update iehprogrm PERIOD (and I wouldn't blame them) now we have two scenarios one a supported program and the other would not be able to support the keywords (ie conflicts)

Where it *MIGHT* work would be something like a new reserved dd name
like sysconf and you could either make it at the job or step level.

How about something similar to an environment variable rather
than overloading the semantics of DD names?

Now you are hopelessly confusing the issue and it would get rather tedious at 0030 in the AM trying to figure out who is doing what

I would prefer to see it as a system (sysplex?) wide option.

Be careful not to conflate your estimate of implementation
complexity with the desirability of a feature.

But you can't , as another system *MIGHT* have been the causer so you have to talk about cross system.

Ed


-----Original Message-----
On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 12:39 PM

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 13:10:16 -0500, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:

     //SYSUT42  DD  DISP=OLD,CONFLICT={SILENT|REPORT},...

That option should likewise be available on SVC 99, and on the ENQ
macro itself.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to