On 13/03/2013 9:41, Paul Gilmartin wrote:

Presumably this is to avoid regressing user mods to members of /etc.
But there's a way to deal with this.  Years ago I took a class in SMP/E
software maintenance (Amdahl taught it).  One of the exercises was
to APPLY a USERMOD then attempt to APPLY service that conflicted with
the USERMOD.  It failed.  RESTORE the USERMOD; APPLY the PTF; then
re-APPLY the USERMOD.  Why is /etc/magic not handled this way?
(I'm confident that we have no user mods to that file.)

/etc is the standard location for system configuration information. In the same way you don't use SMP/E for SYS1.PARMLIB, you wouldn't want to use it for /etc.

I'm not sure how it is packaged in z/OS, but in general I think it is incorrect to replace the /etc directory when installing a new version of the operating system - the same way you would not drop in a totally new SYS1.PARMLIB.

Regards

Andrew Rowley

--
[email protected]
+61 413 302 386

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to