On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 18:02:57 +0000, Rob Scott wrote:.
>
>As for the rules, this is what I use (Ed can correct me if I am wrong).
>
>(o) If the first line of a logical statement has a character in col-72, it
>will not be processed by flowasm and presented to ASMA90 as-is.
>
>(o) If the first line of a logical statement can be processed in flowasm
>format, it will be dynamically changed to traditional format before being
>presented to ASMA90. Subsequent lines in the same logical statement are
>required to be in flowasm format.
>
>(o) Sanity is preserved by not mixing flowasm+traditional lines in the same
>logical statement.
>
(a) is a severe restriction. It largely defeats support of long lines.
What if both (a) and (b) are true? Which dominates?
Example (Yes, I'm wearing my Black Team cloak):
START
* Classic form statement:
LABEL1 DC C'..|....+....|....+....|....+....|....+....|....+....|....+'
...+'
* FLOWED form sttatement:
LABEL2 DC C'..|....+....|....+....|....+....|....+....|....+....|....+'
END
Thanks,
gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
