> What if both (a) and (b) are true? "Doc, when I hit my head with this hammer it hurts!"
"Don't do that." Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Monday, June 7, 2021 12:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Slickedit now supports FLOWASM syntax highlighting for HLASM On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 18:02:57 +0000, Rob Scott wrote:. > >As for the rules, this is what I use (Ed can correct me if I am wrong). > >(o) If the first line of a logical statement has a character in col-72, it >will not be processed by flowasm and presented to ASMA90 as-is. > >(o) If the first line of a logical statement can be processed in flowasm >format, it will be dynamically changed to traditional format before being >presented to ASMA90. Subsequent lines in the same logical statement are >required to be in flowasm format. > >(o) Sanity is preserved by not mixing flowasm+traditional lines in the same >logical statement. > (a) is a severe restriction. It largely defeats support of long lines. What if both (a) and (b) are true? Which dominates? Example (Yes, I'm wearing my Black Team cloak): START * Classic form statement: LABEL1 DC C'..|....+....|....+....|....+....|....+....|....+....|....+' ...+' * FLOWED form sttatement: LABEL2 DC C'..|....+....|....+....|....+....|....+....|....+....|....+' END Thanks, gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
