Good point. Just tried it without FLOWASM and the source line record number is correct (even if the code is in traditional format).
Wondering if this is a bug with HLASM or a side-effect of having one or more of INX, LIBX and PRX defined in ASMAOPT. I will try and find out. Rob. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: 09 June 2021 13:28 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: ... FLOWASM and ASMA435I EXTERNAL EMAIL On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:50:08 +0000, Rob Scott wrote: > ... >On my system, ASMA435I messages for errors in open code (rather than macro >processing) give a value of 0 for the record number, so I am not sure how >useful that is. > Is the behavior identical in the absence of FLOWASM? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ================================ Rocket Software, Inc. and subsidiaries ■ 77 Fourth Avenue, Waltham MA 02451 ■ Main Office Toll Free Number: +1 855.577.4323 Contact Customer Support: https://my.rocketsoftware.com/RocketCommunity/RCEmailSupport Unsubscribe from Marketing Messages/Manage Your Subscription Preferences - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/manage-your-email-preferences Privacy Policy - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/company/legal/privacy-policy ================================ This communication and any attachments may contain confidential information of Rocket Software, Inc. All unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Rocket Software immediately and destroy all copies of this communication. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
