On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:52:39 +0000, Rob Scott wrote: > >Just tried it without FLOWASM and t e source line record number is correct >(even if the code is in traditional format). > >Wondering if this is a bug with HLASM or a side-effect of having one or more >of INX, LIBX and PRX defined in ASMAOPT. > When I was working with the HLASM exits to support NFS, I rrecall stuffing (44 bytes of) the pathname in the reply buffer. I don't recall using record number.
>I will try and find out. > I glanced at the HLASM Users' Guide. I see DSNAME in the reply buffer. I don't notice record number. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
