I am not giving any stamp of approval. On several occasions over the last 30 or 
40 years, we have run for longer or shorter periods on unsupported versions. 
Right now, I am actually at a supported (2.3) level.  A couple of the 
unsupported periods were when it was thought the mainframe's days were near to 
the end. 
Only once do I remember a problem arising where IBM said, sorry, you are at an 
unsupported level. And, on that occasion, I did have a sandbox running a 
supported level where I did reproduce the problem, get a solution which 
happened to have a PTF for the unsupported level I had in production.

I am also now at the point you are. I and our z/OS will retire together within 
the year. All applications have moved. Archive and clean-up underway. 

I pushed for the last upgrade because I knew I would be eliminating ISV 
products with IBM equivalents and I wanted to at least have support for the 
targets.

Which proved wise. IBM DFRMM support in particular was quite helpful.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On
> Behalf Of McCabe, Ron
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 12:52 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: z/OS versions
> 
> Hello IBM List,
> 
> Got a question about how you feel about running on an unsupported z/OS
> version.  Just about like everyone else our company is moving off the
> mainframe ... after several failed attempts I do believe they have something
> that will work this time and I'm OK with it because if they reach their goal 
> End
> of Life for the mainframe will be when I was planning on retiring.
> Some background - we are currently running z/OS 2.2, we started the
> process to upgrade to 2.3 about 6 months ago and we are close to
> implementing providing our DEV's and BA's can finish up the testing that we
> require which is not going very well.  Since the EOL goal for the mainframe is
> 4th quarter 2022 we are now thinking of not implementing z/OS 2.3 since it
> could possibly cause more problems for us than just staying with z/OS 2.2.
> 
> So my question - how does everyone feel about running on an unsupported
> z/OS system?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ron McCabe
> Manager of Mainframe/Midrange Systems
> Mutual of Enumclaw
> 
> 
> Confidentiality Notice: This e- mail and all attachments may contain
> CONFIDENTIAL information and are meant solely for the intended recipient.
> It may contain controlled, privileged, or proprietary information that is
> protected under applicable law and shall not be disclosed to any
> unauthorized third party. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any unauthorized review, action, disclosure,
> distribution, or reproduction of any information contained in this e- mail and
> any attachments is strictly PROHIBITED. If you received this e- mail in error,
> please reply to the sender immediately stating that this transmission was
> misdirected, and delete or destroy all electronic and paper copies of this e-
> mail and attachments without disclosing the contents. This e- mail does not
> grant or assign rights of ownership in the proprietary subject matter herein,
> nor shall it be construed as a joint venture, partnership, teaming agreement,
> or any other formal business relationship.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to