Not get, but got. One of my reported APARs. APAR Identifier ...... OA25089 Last Changed ........ 08/10/02 IOS627E PRIMARY INTERFACE WITH ENCRYPTION KEY MANAGER CANNOT BE CONNECTED DUE TO SOCKET FAILURE ERNO=0000
PROBLEM SUMMARY: **************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: Users at HBB7720 and above * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: IOSVEKMT fails with MSGIOS627E * * ERNO=0000 and ABEND0C4 PIC4 when * * REFRPROT is enabled in PROGxx member. * Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&[email protected] ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Thursday, September 2nd, 2021 at 4:02 PM, Jim Mulder <[email protected]> wrote: > I found IBM RENT modules that modified themselves > > 15 years ago when I was experimenting to see what would > > happen if we tried to page-protect RENT modules. I have a list: > > ANTMAIN > > ANTSDMLK > > IEAVNIPX > > EZATNF > > IOEFSKN > > FNMVZJV > > FNMVZCVA > > EZAXVMCF > > DSNHDECP > > DSN9PARM > > DSN3INI > > CNMINIT > > CNMCSSIM > > CNMCSSIC > > We subsequently removed the unintended RENT from IEAVNIPX. > > So we don't page-protect RENT modules (except for experimental > > purposes under control of another undocumented DIAGxx TRAP name), > > and we implemented REFRPROT instead. I haven't heard about > > any IBM modules that get broken by REFRPROT. > > Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. > > Poughkeepsie NY > > "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" [email protected] wrote on > > 09/02/2021 08:54:25 AM: > > > From: "Seymour J Metz" [email protected] > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Date: 09/02/2021 03:46 PM > > > > Subject: Re: RENT binder option > > > > Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" [email protected] > > > > Given that IBM has fetched RENT load modules and program objects > > > > from authorized concatenations into SP252 for close to half a > > > > century, there is a case for requiring new reentrant code to also be > > > > read only. I agree about REFR. In both cases, IBM has to take > > > > compatibility into account. > > > > There is customer code that is REFR or RENT but not read only. Is > > > > there still any IBM code like that? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > > > > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
