1. No. I would expect any such incidences to be treated as a defect and
fixed.
2. No
3. It was REFR and is still REFR. It was just a simple code bug,
passing a field in the static area to BPX1OPT for a
return parameter that gets modified by BPX1OPT.
Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp.
Poughkeepsie NY
"IBM Mainframe Discussion List" <[email protected]> wrote on
09/03/2021 08:34:33 AM:
> From: "Paul Gilmartin" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Date: 09/03/2021 07:02 PM
> Subject: Re: RENT binder option
> Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" <[email protected]>
>
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:02:07 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote:
>
> > I found IBM RENT modules that modified themselves
> >15 years ago when I was experimenting to see what would
> >happen if we tried to page-protect RENT modules. I have a list:
> >
> Have you a similar list of IBM REFR modules that modify themselfes?
>
> Does the setting of REFRPROT affect processing of modules
> marked RENT but not REFR?
>
> What were the reusability attributes of the module in OA25089?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
