On Fri, 3 Sep 2021 19:49:55 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote: >1. No. I would expect any such incidences to be treated as a defect and >fixed. > >2. No > >3. It was REFR and is still REFR. It was just a simple code bug, > passing a field in the static area to BPX1OPT for a > return parameter that gets modified by BPX1OPT. > Thanks for your detailed answers to many questions in this by now tedious thread.
>"IBM Mainframe Discussion List" <[email protected]> wrote on >09/03/2021 08:34:33 AM: >> From: "Paul Gilmartin" >> To: [email protected] >> >> Have you a similar list of IBM REFR modules that modify themselfes? >> >> Does the setting of REFRPROT affect processing of modules >> marked RENT but not REFR? >> >> What were the reusability attributes of the module in OA25089? Thanks again, gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
