A module in an authorized concatenation with the RENT attribute will go into SP 252 key 0 storage even if it doesn't have the REFR attribute. I don't recall whether it will also be page protected. With some changes in detail, that behavior goes all the way back to OS/360 MVT.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of Paul Gilmartin [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 6, 2021 12:26 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: RENT binder option On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 18:34:36 +1000, Andrew Rowley wrote: > ... >I ran into this many years ago when I "cleaned up" and removed an empty >library from the STEPLIB of one of our subsystems. That suddenly meant >that the STEPLIB was considered APF authorized, which resulted in S0C4 >abends when the subsystem was started and it tried to store information >in its RENT load module. >] Will a module loaded from an APF authorized library and marked RENT but not REFR be placed in write protected storage? It might have been cleaner yet to move the offending module to the unauthorized library, removing the incentive for future "clean up". -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
