Well, the assembler cannot truly report on RENT vs REFR violations, as that can only be determines by running the code. The assembler has no idea if a lock is serializing a section of code.
On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 13:11:39 -0600 Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote: :>(Cross-posting to IBM-MAIN and ASSEMBLER-LIST) :>It's a shame that HLASM (AFAIK) conflates IBM's venerable use of :>RENT and REFR. :>This has led to misunderstanding in this long IBM-MAIN thread. :>And recurrent false reporting by HLASM of RENT violations in :>code that is RENT-compliant but merely violates REFR. :>I suppose it's too late to fix it. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
