It is assigned. It is used by z/OS. It is intentionally not described in Principles of Operation. So that is all we will publicly say about it.
Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie NY "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" <[email protected]> wrote on 10/13/2021 02:57:42 PM: > From: "Joe Monk" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 10/13/2021 07:17 PM > Subject: Re: SIGP Orders > Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" <[email protected]> > > Alan, > > It's being issued by z/os 2.4... I see it in the trace... > > Joe > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 4:11 PM Alan Altmark <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 07:09:23 -0500, Joe Monk <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Looking thru the z/arch POP, I noticed that SIGP order 14 is no longer > > >listed as unassigned, but its definition and functions are missing from > > the > > >POP. > > > > > >Can someone tell us what this order is for? > > > > I suspect that line is supposed to say "Unassigned" just like 0x0F and > > 0x10. Please submit a Reader's Comment Form to request clarification. > > > > Alan Altmark > > IBM > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
