Good question. The big problem is at one customer. We have another customer -- z/OS release number question still pending -- that is running the possibly problematic code with no issue.
There was one POC where the prospect installed the product, which supports the use of TCP or UDP. The prospect wanted to use TCP but there was an unrelated issue with TCP so they tried UDP. I *think* they *may* have seen this problem, but they had no interest in exploring the UDP issue since what they really wanted was TCP. Perhaps it was something else -- some unrelated firewall configuration issue or something. For obvious reasons we have not shipped this code to anyone else. We have 1.11, 1.12, and 1.13 test LPARs and have never seen a hint of anything like this in testing. So the answer to your question is a little unclear. 1 or 2 customers out of 3. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 2:14 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Lost datagrams on z/OS 1.12? Charles Mills wrote: >I have told the customer that it may be our problem In all your posts, you're speaking of one? customer. Do this problem appears at your other customers? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
