The disassembler can not determine if the original source was an
=A(xxxx) or =V(xxx). This, and other things, require someone to work
with the disassembled code to actually make it assemble clean.
It's amazing that the disassembler does as good a job as it does. Pat
the guys on the back that wrote it.
Tony Thigpen
David Spiegel wrote on 11/17/21 5:50 PM:
Hi,
I have been given a Load Module and source code.
The Source Code, however, does not 100% match the Disassembled Load Module.
This module has been running in production since 1994.
With that preface ...
I tried reassembling the disassembled module source and have a problem.
One instruction says:
L R2,=A(TSAUXWRK)
Later in the program, I see the following in the disassembled source
DC A(TSAUXWRK)
Yet, the definition of TSAUXWRK appears nowhere in the disassembled
source, causing a ASM044E.
I looked in the source provided and it has:
TSAUXWRK CSECT
in the middle of the program. (When I assemble this, even though it is
not the correct source, I get a clean assembly.)
Has anyone encountered anything like this (addressing a CSECT as an
A=CON works, but, only with original source)?
Is there a remedy for this?
Thanks and regards,
David
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
