I am seeing the same value in both fields. IMGWU definitely appears to be the MSU cap. I am guessing that LACS being equal means we are capped at that value (despite what the doc says).
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Friday, November 19, 2021 12:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Is there a field that would reflect LPAR soft-capping? I will build a quick and dirty Rexx to display those two fields on demand and see what I learn. Thanks again! Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Friday, November 19, 2021 11:56 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Is there a field that would reflect LPAR soft-capping? Charles I think the RCTIMGWU field is what you are looking for, in short it's defined as Image defined MSU's - as the softcap is changed that value is updated, I'm not 100% sure that's what your asking, if not sorry. Mark's Rexx performs some calculations to report on used MSU's on a rolling 4hr average and the unused MSU for the 4hr average ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
