Yeah, I read the whole article and nowhere does it contradict my claims. 
Perhaps you interpret incorrectly!


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Saturday, December 11, 2021, 11:11 PM, Tom Brennan 
<[email protected]> wrote:

I just made a fake account and now I can read it.
I wonder if Bill read it all the way to the bottom, because there are 
some points in the article that don't really help his case.

On 12/11/2021 6:04 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 20:40:08 +0000, Bill Johnson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> https://www.americanbanker.com/news/why-some-banks-still-lean-on-mainframes
>>
> I can't read beyond the first 2 paragraphs on either Firefox or Edge.
> 
> Clark Morris
>>
>>
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, December 11, 2021, 3:10 PM, Tom Brennan 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> And that's where we disagree.  Banks will do whatever is most economical
>> that still meets their needs.  If x86-cloud doesn't meet those
>> requirements today, they stay on the mainframe.  Tomorrow... only the
>> shadow knows.
>>
>> People say OS/2 was far better in design, operation, and security than
>> Windows, but it's gone now.  Sometimes the "best" system is simply what
>> everybody else is using.  Got to go now because I just put in a betamax.
>>
>> On 12/11/2021 10:51 AM, Bill Johnson wrote:
>>> Do you put your DR placement right across the street from your data center? 
>>> Consolidation is bad. Exposure for everyone in the same place is a disaster 
>>> waiting to happen. Like last week. It's why truly important functions like 
>>> banks don't do clouds.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, December 11, 2021, 1:46 PM, Tom Brennan 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Of course... military has the money (the $500 hammer?) to have
>>> redundancy on their redundancy.  Business installations normally can't
>>> justify those costs.
>>>
>>> However, I think if we looked close we both might be surprised at all
>>> the various baskets AWS has behind the scenes.  But like any basket
>>> collection, there are always single points of failure.
>>>
>>> On 12/11/2021 6:06 AM, Bill Johnson wrote:
>>>> You've just described what the mainframe does for an organization. But, I 
>>>> don't want every organization to have its eggs in one basket any more than 
>>>> I want every nuclear weapon in one silo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, December 11, 2021, 2:01 AM, Tom Brennan 
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I don't agree (surprise!) I've always advocated putting all your eggs in
>>>> one basket, and then taking really good care of that basket with
>>>> backups, DR, procedures, dual this, dual that, etc.
>>>>
>>>> On 12/10/2021 5:55 PM, Bill Johnson wrote:
>>>>> This paragraph concerns me.
>>>>> One of the founding principles of the early Internet design was 
>>>>> decentralization - by design, a single fault would not be able to take 
>>>>> out everything. In a way, today's reliance on large cloud providers 
>>>>> removes the benefits of decentralization; we rely on the scalability, 
>>>>> cost effectiveness, and flexibility of today's SaaS and Cloud offerings 
>>>>> yet we are potentially putting all of our eggs into one basket. This same 
>>>>> statement applies to CDNs, as seen with the recent Akamai outage from 
>>>>> this past summer.
>>>>> This was one of the drawbacks we experienced when our GM subsidiary (and 
>>>>> all GM subsidiaries eventually) combined into EDS data centers. Charlotte 
>>>>> was where ours was located. If the mainframe went down in Charlotte, 
>>>>> multiple GM subsidiaries were screwed. Costing GM tens of millions in 
>>>>> highly paid union labor twiddling their thumbs.
>>>>> If an ETSY business owner selling crocheted scarves has a 4 hour outage, 
>>>>> it's probably not that bad. If an auto plant, bank or brokerage, health 
>>>>> care provider, insurance company, or airline is down for 4 hours, it 
>>>>> could be disastrous.
>>>>> Clouds aren't all they're cracked up to be.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, December 10, 2021, 8:00 PM, Mark Regan <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Since this topic is still somewhat active, I thought I'd forward this 
>>>>> link.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.thousandeyes.com/blog/aws-outage-analysis-dec-7-2021
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark Regan, K8MTR, EN80tg
>>>>> CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1979 active; 1979-1991, reserves; including two
>>>>> years with the Ohio Air National Guard)
>>>>> Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017 (z/OS Network Software 
>>>>> Consultant)
>>>>> Email:        [email protected]
>>>>> LinkedIn:  https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-t-regan
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>> .
>>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> .
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to