Must be the psych classes I took. 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Sunday, December 12, 2021, 10:52 AM, Tom Brennan 
<[email protected]> wrote:

I don't know how you dig into my brain (and Shmuel's apparently) but you 
do.  You know things I don't even know myself.  I'm even up early this 
morning monitoring a z15 implementation, yet deep down I must be 
thinking even this new box has no future.  Thank you.

On 12/12/2021 7:12 AM, Bill Johnson wrote:
> Admit it, you were a true believer in the 90’s that the mainframe would be 
> gone by 2000. And now you’re a true believer that the cloud will kill it. And 
> there isn’t one fact that supports you. None. It’s still growing by leaps and 
> bounds. Doing more work every year.
> 
> 
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> 
> 
> On Sunday, December 12, 2021, 10:04 AM, Tom Brennan 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Of course.  What what I thinking SMH.  You are always right.
> 
> On 12/12/2021 6:52 AM, Bill Johnson wrote:
>> Yeah, I read the whole article and nowhere does it contradict my claims. 
>> Perhaps you interpret incorrectly!
>>
>>
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, December 11, 2021, 11:11 PM, Tom Brennan 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I just made a fake account and now I can read it.
>> I wonder if Bill read it all the way to the bottom, because there are
>> some points in the article that don't really help his case.
>>
>> On 12/11/2021 6:04 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 20:40:08 +0000, Bill Johnson
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://www.americanbanker.com/news/why-some-banks-still-lean-on-mainframes
>>>>
>>> I can't read beyond the first 2 paragraphs on either Firefox or Edge.
>>>
>>> Clark Morris
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, December 11, 2021, 3:10 PM, Tom Brennan 
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> And that's where we disagree.  Banks will do whatever is most economical
>>>> that still meets their needs.  If x86-cloud doesn't meet those
>>>> requirements today, they stay on the mainframe.  Tomorrow... only the
>>>> shadow knows.
>>>>
>>>> People say OS/2 was far better in design, operation, and security than
>>>> Windows, but it's gone now.  Sometimes the "best" system is simply what
>>>> everybody else is using.  Got to go now because I just put in a betamax.
>>>>
>>>> On 12/11/2021 10:51 AM, Bill Johnson wrote:
>>>>> Do you put your DR placement right across the street from your data 
>>>>> center? Consolidation is bad. Exposure for everyone in the same place is 
>>>>> a disaster waiting to happen. Like last week. It's why truly important 
>>>>> functions like banks don't do clouds.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, December 11, 2021, 1:46 PM, Tom Brennan 
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course... military has the money (the $500 hammer?) to have
>>>>> redundancy on their redundancy.  Business installations normally can't
>>>>> justify those costs.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, I think if we looked close we both might be surprised at all
>>>>> the various baskets AWS has behind the scenes.  But like any basket
>>>>> collection, there are always single points of failure.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/11/2021 6:06 AM, Bill Johnson wrote:
>>>>>> You've just described what the mainframe does for an organization. But, 
>>>>>> I don't want every organization to have its eggs in one basket any more 
>>>>>> than I want every nuclear weapon in one silo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, December 11, 2021, 2:01 AM, Tom Brennan 
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't agree (surprise!) I've always advocated putting all your eggs in
>>>>>> one basket, and then taking really good care of that basket with
>>>>>> backups, DR, procedures, dual this, dual that, etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/10/2021 5:55 PM, Bill Johnson wrote:
>>>>>>> This paragraph concerns me.
>>>>>>> One of the founding principles of the early Internet design was 
>>>>>>> decentralization - by design, a single fault would not be able to take 
>>>>>>> out everything. In a way, today's reliance on large cloud providers 
>>>>>>> removes the benefits of decentralization; we rely on the scalability, 
>>>>>>> cost effectiveness, and flexibility of today's SaaS and Cloud offerings 
>>>>>>> yet we are potentially putting all of our eggs into one basket. This 
>>>>>>> same statement applies to CDNs, as seen with the recent Akamai outage 
>>>>>>> from this past summer.
>>>>>>> This was one of the drawbacks we experienced when our GM subsidiary 
>>>>>>> (and all GM subsidiaries eventually) combined into EDS data centers. 
>>>>>>> Charlotte was where ours was located. If the mainframe went down in 
>>>>>>> Charlotte, multiple GM subsidiaries were screwed. Costing GM tens of 
>>>>>>> millions in highly paid union labor twiddling their thumbs.
>>>>>>> If an ETSY business owner selling crocheted scarves has a 4 hour 
>>>>>>> outage, it's probably not that bad. If an auto plant, bank or 
>>>>>>> brokerage, health care provider, insurance company, or airline is down 
>>>>>>> for 4 hours, it could be disastrous.
>>>>>>> Clouds aren't all they're cracked up to be.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, December 10, 2021, 8:00 PM, Mark Regan 
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since this topic is still somewhat active, I thought I'd forward this 
>>>>>>> link.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.thousandeyes.com/blog/aws-outage-analysis-dec-7-2021
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mark Regan, K8MTR, EN80tg
>>>>>>> CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1979 active; 1979-1991, reserves; including two
>>>>>>> years with the Ohio Air National Guard)
>>>>>>> Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017 (z/OS Network Software 
>>>>>>> Consultant)
>>>>>>> Email:        [email protected]
>>>>>>> LinkedIn:  https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-t-regan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>> .
>>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> .
>>
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> .
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to