Take a look at D4A32XX3, D4B32XX3 and D4332XX3. What is important is that they 
all have BINDFLAG set tp BINSEDS (X'80'), indicating support for extended data 
stream.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of 
Alexander Huemer [[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2021 10:14 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VTAM LU coding for 3192G display

In VTAM there are several LUs defined, all equal. Only displays, no
printers. On the 3174 there is no special provisioning either.
I know of the existence of PSERVIC in the LOGMODE macros, but not how to
craft PSERVIC values.
GDDM is working e.g. on the 3290.

-Alex

On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 09:57:29PM +1100, Attila Fogarasi wrote:
> I just remembered that unrelated devices on the same controller can affect
> what are valid values for the bind for 3192g.  For example if there is a
> 3287 (printer) defined on the same controller, then the max RU size is
> reduced even for the 3192g (so what would have been a valid bind with no
> 3287 configured becomes invalid).  This is the reason the otherwise very
> capable 3270 architecture became abandoned :)  All of this varies with
> specific device types, of course, once you get out of mainstream devices.
> Good luck getting GDDM working.
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 9:42 PM Attila Fogarasi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Logmode is invalid for the physical device, sense 0821 means that the bind
> > was rejected due to having invalid parameters (which come from the logmode
> > entry).  You might want to check the PSERVIC value.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to