+1 

I agree on the native libraries support for “ADDRESS …” as a set of modules to 
import.

I think there are the basis for a set of RFEs or other open source development. 
 TSO, …   this would be a more intuitive way to move forward than the approach 
taken in Z Open Automation Utilities.

its definitely going to be something that happens over time.

Matt Hogstrom
e-mail [email protected]

“Quantity has a quality all its own.”
— Joseph Stalin

> On Dec 20, 2021, at 2:00 PM, Kirk Wolf <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I'm shocked that most ibm-mainers are not convinced by this paper :-)
> 
> More seriously, I would add a couple of points:
> 
> - Whether or not you like Python or think that it is weak tea compared to 
> REXX, you should support getting a good Python implementation on z/OS.    Our 
> favorite platform will be more attractive if it runs popular languages - and 
> Python is king these days.
> 
> - Python isn't perfect, but it is seriously nice.  This judgement is based on 
> the amazing software that I have seen written in it.  Try one example:  Meld 
> is a terrific FOSS visual diff / merge tool that is multi-platform and 
> written in Python.  Try it out and then look at the source code.  
> https://meldmerge.org/
> 
> - I agree that Python on z/OS could use some native libraries to do z/OS 
> interfaces like REXX.
> 
> 
> Kirk Wolf
> Dovetailed Technologies
> http://dovetail.com
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to