It sounds like a "SETICSF FLUSH" command or similar is what you are
suggesting. ("don't turn off any options, but ensure that everything up to
that point is flushed/handled").
I would ask you to open an RFE and post back here so others can vote for
it. That will make it easier for me to push for it.
As always, I cannot promise anything, but I think this is a good idea.
Eric Rossman, CISSP®
ICSF Cryptographic Security Development
z/OS Enabling Technologies
[email protected]
Dave Jousma wrote on 01/03/2022 at 03:31 PM:
> Thanks again Eric. I'd like to see IBM "clean up" that last little
> bit of housekeeping and really make ICSF task a "hands off" task
> with regards to starting/stopping. Its going to get more difficult
> to run without anyway. For me, losing those last few SMF records
> or last used updates on key records is less of an issue than not
> being able to serve the encrypt/decrypt request at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
