SPOOL isn't relevant when the RECEIVE has an INfoo parameter. maybe add the new parameters but only allow them if there is an INfoo?
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of Paul Gilmartin [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 17, 2022 12:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: TSO RECEIVE prompt for output temporary dataset On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:57:29 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >That should work. I still think that there should be an OUTDD parameter on >RECEIVE. > There's a TOCTTOU hazard to either a parameter or a stacked reply that IBM might fear: another spool file might arrive in that window. The protocol should be that the script intercepts the text of the prompt and parses it to decide how to reply. Or, include the spool ID as a parameter. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
