No. In the context of a separate jobstep, "same REXX" only makes sense if interpreted as "new invocation of same REXX". Without the restriction to separate jobsteps, it's trivial to use the temporary twice in the same invocation.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of Sri h Kolusu [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 6:02 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: TSO RECEIVE prompt for output temporary dataset > What does he code in the JCL of the next step in order to allocate the temporary dataset that he created in the REXX? I guess you overlooked this sentence from my message "OP then needs to finish the next step processing also in the same rexx." Thanks, Kolusu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
