Ah, "more expensive" vs "less expensive", now that IS capitalism -- and perfectly rational, if one balances cost and benefit. I mean, if you get rid of your experienced and competent more-expensive workers and keep your less experience but incompetent ones, you may find yourself regretting the choice soon afterwand.
But if the EFFECT is to discriminate against older employees, I can't find fault with that; what interests me is the intent, legally speaking. ...Although I speak from the safety of contracting. My income seems to be secure, in that I don't depend on a single employer. So maybe it's too easy for me to blithely make fine distinctions. --- Bob Bridges, [email protected], cell 336 382-7313 /* A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul. -George Bernard Shaw */ -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Bill Johnson Sent: Monday, February 14, 2022 07:59 The cycle of replacing higher priced workers with lower cost ones always happens. Exactly what capitalism is designed to do. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
