In
<of4a98f87b.4966d7c3-on85257b3f.00513305-85257b3f.0051f...@us.ibm.com>,
on 03/31/2013
at 10:54 AM, Peter Relson <[email protected]> said:
>I thought that by mentioning CALL, ATTACH, and XCTL"interface" you
>were referring to the interface to the target routine, where the
>"traditional" parameter list format is register 1 pointing to a
>parameter list each entry of which contained the address of a
>parameter (or perhaps "argument" is the proper term here).
>The "interface" to an EXEC PGM= target is not that "traditional"
>form, of course.
Of course it is; R1 points to a parameter list, with end-of-lisat in
the first word, and the first word of the parameter list points to the
PARM value. There is nothing in the definition of, e.g., CALL, LINK,
to specify the format of the parameters pointed to by the parameter
list.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
