Sorry, you're right of course, non-exact speaking on my part ...
I first had to check the German meaning of "dope" in this context to
understand what "dope vector" stands for ...
Am 01.04.2013 16:15, schrieb Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.):
In <[email protected]>, on 03/31/2013
at 06:39 PM, Bernd Oppolzer <[email protected]> said:
Of course, if the called program is PL/1, things get complicated
again, because PL/1 needs descriptors (called dope vectors in
earlier releases),
The dope vectors contained addresses; a descriptor does not. The
equivalent of a dope vector is a locator/descriptor, not a descriptor
in isolation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
