On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 11:05:22 -0600, Wendell Lovewell wrote: > >Many years ago, I used a virtual card reader on MVS and the CMS users used a >REXX exec to >'SPOOL PUN TO zosvm...' >'PUNCH fn ft fm ( NOH' >'CLOSE PUN' > >You might have to play games to have longer than 80-byte records in your jobs. > > Would a unit record device other than PUN (perhaps PIPEd) relax that constraint?
As I learned Pipelines I adopted the habit of DEFINing a fresh UR device rather than saving and restoring the characteristics of an existing one (and CONT can't be restored.) I wrote an ISPF Edit macro to submit with no F-80 limitation. > ... And RSCS will (I think) propagate the CMS userid as already validated (that might not be the case now). Seems like I might have written a JES exit to accept the userid on the spool file as the MVS userid for the job when it was read from the virtual card reader. (Same disclaimer.) > Our admins, rather, replicated the RACF profiles from our TSO IDs to our CMS IDs. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
