As long as the code is under your control, you can define a protocol for selecting options via SYSPARM and it works equally well for, e.g., open code, nested include, preprocessor procedures.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of Phil Smith III [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 8:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: PL/I question Shmuel wrote: > There was mention of a possible need for two versions, and I was just pointing out that you can have a single source file that generates two different versions of the object code. Oh. There might be a need for two versions of the *include* file; not sure whether that can be made bimodal, but thanks, that might be something to explore, though that would require more PL/I expertise than I remember, whereas a second include file would not! Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
