I thought the same thing, at first (maybe without the "sheesh"). But he's talking about a sentence in the text: "As Figure 1 illustrates, IBM’s z14 and z15 distributions again exhibited the most solid security, outperforming all other competitors. Only a minuscule 0.1% of IBM Z high-end server enterprise customers reported a successful data breach that resulted in tangible downtime or compromised or stolen data." Whereas the title for Figure 1 refers to downtime. The article is correct and the title of the figure is mistaken.
On the other hand, zMan is too eager to heap scorn, too. That one mistake doesn't make the whole survey meaningless. --- Bob Bridges, [email protected], cell 336 382-7313 /* History does not always repeat itself. Sometimes it just yells "Can't you remember anything I told you?" and lets fly with a club. -John W Campbell */ -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Joe Monk Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2022 06:29 Then you clearly dont know how to read... "enterprise customers reported a successful data breach that resulted in tangible downtime" So its downtime as a result of a breach. Sheesh. --- On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 11:16 PM zMan <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, I find this "survey" meaningless as reported. Figure 1 says > it's showing downtime, then the text says it's a percentage of > systems that have reported a data breach. Which is it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
