Looks like maybe he wants _BPX_SHAREAS=REUSE Joe
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 11:24 AM Paul Gilmartin < [email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 29 May 2022 14:50:50 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: > > >_รง there are some restrictions. > > > Many. I believe BPXBATCH unconditionally creates a new > address space but sets _BPX_SHAREAS there. > > BPXBATSL spawns locally but is privileged. > > BPXWUNIX? > > COZBATCH? > > BPX1SPN? > > Stack multiple commands separated by ";" in STDPARM? > > What is the OP's real requirement? Sample code? Are there > ENQ conflicts? > > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: ] ITschak Mugzach > >> Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2022 9:00 AM > >> > >> I am running a program that calls BPXBATCH several times. Each call > creates > >> another task (STC) that runs the command. I want to use the same time > used > >> to create a new stc every call and that the unix task will remain active > >> the entire job life. Is this possible? > > -- > gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
