Explain it to me Bob. I gotta hear this.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Friday, June 3, 2022, 8:02 PM, Bob Bridges <[email protected]> wrote: No, Bill, you don't, or at least you didn't in this case. I don’t mind explaining it to you, if you really missed it. If you don't care, I'll leave it. --- Bob Bridges, [email protected], cell 336 382-7313 /* The cities are for money but the high-up hills are purely for the soul. -from _Galloway_ by Louis L'Amour */ -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Bill Johnson Sent: Friday, June 3, 2022 19:03 I read just fine. There’s more than just the headline. --- On Friday, June 3, 2022, 6:58 PM, Tony Harminc <[email protected]> wrote: Do you not understand how to read? --- On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 17:11, Bill Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > And they’re appealing. So no payment will be made yet. Do you not understand > how courts work? --- On Friday, June 3, 2022, 5:09 PM, Tony Harminc <[email protected]> wrote: Uh, no. The subject line is exactly "IBM ordered to pay $1.6b to BMC". --- On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 15:49, Bill Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > Saying it will or won’t be overturned is just as silly as insinuating IBM > will now hand over 1.6 billion at this stage of the proceedings. Yet, the > headline states and the OP assumes exactly that. Gleefully I might add. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
