On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 9:06 PM Bill Johnson < 00000047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote, in reply to my request for a citation that shows Tony Harminc thinks that IBM *will* hand over $1.6e+09:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 15:49, Bill Johnson > <00000047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > Saying it will or won’t be overturned is just as silly as insinuating > IBM will now hand over 1.6 billion at this stage of the proceedings. Yet, > the headline states and the OP assumes exactly that. Gleefully I might add. > > Uh, no. The subject line is exactly "IBM ordered to pay $1.6b to BMC". > That's what I thought. What I don't understand is how you can read more into that statement than that IBM was *ordered* to pay. In particular, that statement says exactly zero about IBM's intentions, and does not assume that the order is the last word - which, sa you have repeatedly pointed out, it is not. -- Jay Maynard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
